Planned Cuts Signal Change for Extension, Aquaculture
President Bush proposed a cut of 12% to university agricultural research
and extension programs in his 2006 budget. The administration suggests
that this cut can be largely offset by a large increase for the National
Research Initiative (NRI), the government’s main program of competitive
grants for agriculture research.
However, cutting so called ‘formula funds’ decreases the capacity
of extension agents to work directly with industry, because agents will be required
to spend increasing amounts of time preparing and submitting grants just to support
basic operations. The $143 million cut would affect the USDAs Cooperative State
Research, Education, and Extension Service, through which the government helps
support land-grant universities and other institutions. Hatch Act grants, which
help finance experiment stations at land-grant institutions, would also be cut
(from $179 million to $89 million). McIntire Stennis Forestry grants would halved
as well, while support for Animal Health and Disease Research Programs would
be eliminated.
The budget redirects much of the money from those programs to the
NRI and a new program of regional, state, and local competitive grants. Spending
on the NRI
would increase by $70 million, to $250 million. Budget projections for extension
services covered under the Smith-Lever Act would remain at the current level.
Still, the budget reflects a net loss for agriculture research and extension
exceeding $100 million. Similarly, the federal budget for aquaculture research,
managed by the USDA’s Agricultural Research Service is in similar peril,
with cuts exceeding $19 million.
The proposed budget, if accepted by Congress,
will greatly reduce the programs and services provided to U.S. food production,
processing, and aquaculture firms
by Land Grant Universities and other federally-funded laboratories. It is clear
that supporting domestic food production is no longer considered a primary
goal, since imports can provide much of the American consumer’s needs. University
support to industry, demonstrated by the programs and services they currently
provide, will have to change substantially. If the budget measure is passed,
any future support for major research activities will have to be obtained from
competitive grants, which may or may not meet the critical needs of industry.
|
Items
Of
Interest
News
Notes
Calendar
of Events
2006
ICRA
Publications
Previous
Newsletters |